RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:57 pm
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2014 at 5:57 pm by C4RM5.)
I never once said I was trying to, read my previous posts.
Poll: Should Gays have rights in society? This poll is closed. |
|||
Yes, this is their natural right to be gay. | 13 | 92.86% | |
No, being gay is not natural therefore they have no natural right to be gay. | 0 | 0% | |
No, being gay is against a Divine Command and therefore they have no rights but be subject to punishment! | 0 | 0% | |
Yes, this is not a natural right but Gays have rights to be Gay no matter the circumstances and social templates. | 1 | 7.14% | |
Total | 14 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
|
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:57 pm
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2014 at 5:57 pm by C4RM5.)
I never once said I was trying to, read my previous posts.
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:57 pm
Wow, just wow
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:58 pm
I have already answered, I am not sure so don't get angry.
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:58 pm
(October 12, 2014 at 5:54 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote:(October 12, 2014 at 5:13 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I wasn't out right saying I don't like gay marriage I said I wasn't sure, put it this way if I was asked to go to a gay marriage I would decline. Yeah, see, but he didn't actually say that. He didn't say the opposite either, though, so you can flip a coin and probably get a better chance at figuring out his opinion than by reading his comments.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:58 pm
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:59 pm
(October 12, 2014 at 5:58 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I have already answered, I am not sure Why not? (October 12, 2014 at 5:58 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: so don't get angry. YOU CAN'T TELL ME WHAT TO DO!!! (That's a joke, by the way, hence the smiley)
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything? RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 5:59 pm
I can't work out why everyone is so angry because I said I wasn't sure
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 6:00 pm
You wouldn't go to your offspring's weddings if they're gay
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 6:00 pm
(This post was last modified: October 12, 2014 at 6:01 pm by C4RM5.)
I am not sure because I haven't yet come to a conclusion yet
(October 12, 2014 at 6:00 pm)DramaQueen Wrote: You wouldn't go to your offspring's weddings if they're gay Yes I wouldn't go to an offspring's wedding if they were gay. RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 12, 2014 at 6:01 pm
Why?!
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|