SCIENCE FINALLY PROVES....

[Thumpalumpacus]

Don't open this, dingbat.

---

---

[Angrboda]

[Foxaèr]

Science

[LinuxGal]

John 20:7 And the napkin, that was about his head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself.

If the Lord's face was covered with that cloth, then how did the image of his face get on the shroud too?

Like I said, there are 3 hour long video's explaining.

That's about how long it would take to explain something like that.

[Fake Messiah]

What... No scientific rebuttals?

The Shroud of Turin is a proven forgery (along with all other supposed shrouds of Jesus)

After three separate tests in laboratories in Arizona, Oxford and Zurich, the scientists stated with 95 per cent confidence that the shroud dated from 1260-1390, (a date range which happened to include the first documented references to the cloth).

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...50101.html

[LinuxGal]

What... No scientific rebuttals?

The Shroud of Turin is a proven forgery (along with all other supposed shrouds of Jesus)

After three separate tests in laboratories in Arizona, Oxford and Zurich, the scientists stated with 95 per cent confidence that the shroud dated from 1260-1390, (a date range which happened to include the first documented references to the cloth).

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world...50101.html

No examples of the shroud linen's complex herringbone twill weave date from the first century.

The shroud has no known history prior to the mid-fourteenth century, when it turned up in the possession of a man who never explained how he had obtained the most holy relic in Christendom.

The physique is unnaturally elongated (like figures in Gothic art), and there is a lack of wraparound distortions that would be expected if the cloth had enclosed an actual three-dimensional object like a human body. 

The hair hangs as for a standing, rather than reclining figure.

The distinguished microanalyst Walter McCrone identified the "blood" as red ocher and vermilion tempera paint and concluded that the entire image had been painted.

In 1988, the shroud cloth was radiocarbon dated by three different laboratories (at Zurich, Oxford, and the University of Arizona). The results were in close agreement and yield a date range of a.d. 1260-1390, about the time of the reported forger's confession (ca. a.d. 1355).

[Ravenshire]

The most important part about claims like these, is the lack of any actual announcements. All we ever get is bullshit videos claiming the debunking of the science, but never any scientists making real claims in the real world and collecting their Nobel prize for actually proving the existence of the divine.

[BrianSoddingBoru4]

If the Shroud is genuine, why does the figure on it have long hair and European features?

If the Shroud is genuine, why are the 'blood' stains on it reddish-brown (old, dried blood is black)?

If the Shroud is genuine, why aren't the wounds on the image consistent with actual crucifixion wounds?

If the Shroud is genuine, why didn't anyone know about it until the 14th century?

(Hint: The answer to all of these questions is the same.)

Boru

[no one]

Too much crack it is.

[Mister Agenda]

Where did ronedee go?