Posts: 66411
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
160
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 16, 2015 at 11:28 am
(This post was last modified: October 16, 2015 at 11:36 am by The Grand Nudger.)
(October 13, 2015 at 10:17 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote: (October 12, 2015 at 11:58 pm)Rhythm Wrote: Take a look at the causal inference in the transposition, whereby...a report in the paper -tommorrow- seems to have some effect on whether or not a ship crashes -tonight-. It's all on the up and up, of course, textbook even. Has it ever been the case, in your experience, that some event "x" tommorrow was the cause of some outcome "y" today?
Nevertheless, armed with this valid form, loaded up with sound propositions - have you abandoned your belief in asymmetric time and cause?
Well... first, I don't think that a newspaper report has causal sufficiency to crash a ship (at least not directly, perhaps as a secondary cause through misinformation). It doesn't matter what you think, impeach the validity of the form or the sound nature of the propositions.
Quote:Secondly, I was say that your transposition is a demonstration of the principle of causality in making an inference, not a causal force. Lastly, a lack of a report in the newspaper does not necessarily mean that a ship has not crashed.
It's a demonstration of our logic's difficulties in handling causal inference. Your first cause argument is a claim regarding causal inference. I just wanted you to see one of the most extreme examples of how that system buckles under those types of propositions. I offered you an example of how following the rules -to the letter- can lead us to a conclusion which the mind immediately reels against. If you feel that your first cause argument is a compelling reason to believe in god, or that the argument in and of itself is compelling as to some first cause, you should believe that this ship in the night argument is a good reason to believe in symmetric time and cause.
I don't, personally, believe that the papers report causes the shipwreck myself - no more than you do....but the rules of our system tell us that it does. One mans MT is another mans MP, or not...lol...but that would be troubling, since that would mean we have the rules wrong...... If, however, we have those rules wrong, what reason do you have to believe in the truth of -any- logical statement, including Kalam?
Quote:So, as of yet, I don't think I'm ready to rid myself of asymmetric time and cause.
Then a valid argument with sound propositions is not enough to compel you, and thusly I seriously doubt that you have been compelled by Kalam. It seems more likely to me, given your refusal to accept what is valid and sound as true, that the first cause argument is just a front for your beliefs, which are in no way affected by that argument.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 3709
Threads: 18
Joined: September 29, 2015
Reputation:
10
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 2:07 pm
(October 16, 2015 at 11:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: (October 13, 2015 at 10:17 pm)RoadRunner79 Wrote:
It doesn't matter what you think, impeach the validity of the form or the sound nature of the propositions.
I call shenanigans as your initial claim was about what seems to be an effect. I could equally claim that what seems to you doesn't matter as well in response to your query first. This is nothing more than sophistry of my choice of the word "think". I am actually fairly confident that a newspaper report is insufficient as a cause (at least directly) for the crashing of a ship.
(October 16, 2015 at 11:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: Quote:
It's a demonstration of our logic's difficulties in handling causal inference. Your first cause argument is a claim regarding causal inference. I just wanted you to see one of the most extreme examples of how that system buckles under those types of propositions. I offered you an example of how following the rules -to the letter- can lead us to a conclusion which the mind immediately reels against. If you feel that your first cause argument is a compelling reason to believe in god, or that the argument in and of itself is compelling as to some first cause, you should believe that this ship in the night argument is a good reason to believe in symmetric time and cause.
I think you are misunderstanding modus tollens, in implying that it changes the causality direction. It presupposes the law of causality to make an inference which is then valid. It doesn't say that the newspaper report tomorrow effects a ship crashing today, but that we may make an inference based on the effect (or lack thereof) to make and inductive conclusion to the cause. Also, as stated before, when involving a personal agent or cause, they can choose not to produce the effect in accordance with the cause. So it does call into question the necessity of the effect to the cause. Or it is possible to have the cause but not the effect.
(October 16, 2015 at 11:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: I don't, personally, believe that the papers report causes the shipwreck myself - no more than you do....but the rules of our system tell us that it does. One mans MT is another mans MP, or not...lol...but that would be troubling, since that would mean we have the rules wrong...... If, however, we have those rules wrong, what reason do you have to believe in the truth of -any- logical statement, including Kalam?
I don't think that the issue is with the rules, but your understanding of them.... In my understanding, I do not have to say that the rules of logic are wrong. You are the one who appears to be making that case, and I believe it is a misunderstanding of the rules, rather than an issue with the rules of logic themselves.
(October 16, 2015 at 11:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: Quote:So, as of yet, I don't think I'm ready to rid myself of asymmetric time and cause.
Then a valid argument with sound propositions is not enough to compel you, and thusly I seriously doubt that you have been compelled by Kalam. It seems more likely to me, given your refusal to accept what is valid and sound as true, that the first cause argument is just a front for your beliefs, which are in no way affected by that argument.
I have given reasons why I do not accept that a newspaper report is the cause of a ship crashing previously. Further I questioned the sufficiency of a report being capable of causing the crash directly. I also believe that this is largely the result of a misunderstanding of the "rules" by yourself. I don't think that you have made a good case for this being "valid or true". And it would seem that your whole argument here, is against something which you admittedly do not believe yourself. Are you making a case against logic and reason?
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 6:02 pm
And the futile debates begin once again 
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 6:14 pm
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2015 at 6:14 pm by Alex K.)
Very nice! Let me just nitpick that you vastly undersell the number of stars in the visible universe, which is projected to be in the thousand billion billions.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 359
Threads: 47
Joined: August 31, 2015
Reputation:
4
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 7:26 pm
(October 17, 2015 at 6:14 pm)Alex K Wrote: Very nice! Let me just nitpick that you vastly undersell the number of stars in the visible universe, which is projected to be in the thousand billion billions. THE ANSWER IS 4!!!
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 9:17 pm
(October 17, 2015 at 7:26 pm)Shining_Finger Wrote: (October 17, 2015 at 6:14 pm)Alex K Wrote: Very nice! Let me just nitpick that you vastly undersell the number of stars in the visible universe, which is projected to be in the thousand billion billions. THE ANSWER IS 4!!! That was a bad answer and you should feel bad!!!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 9:18 pm
Nono, the answer was 4 in one of the Spot the Loony sections of that Monty Python game show of the same name.
Posts: 18510
Threads: 129
Joined: January 19, 2014
Reputation:
91
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 10:07 pm
(This post was last modified: October 17, 2015 at 10:07 pm by Alex K.)
THAT'S NUMBERWANG!!!
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
Posts: 43162
Threads: 720
Joined: September 21, 2008
Reputation:
133
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 17, 2015 at 10:12 pm
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: I was interviewed by a world religions class student
October 18, 2015 at 2:14 am
Ah, I love numberwang.
I was wondering whether to make a thread about it so we could play it ourselves...
|
![[Image: atheist_stereotypes_by_uchihakaito-d4yng2u.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=img01.deviantart.net%2F9be6%2Fi%2F2012%2F125%2Fb%2Fc%2Fatheist_stereotypes_by_uchihakaito-d4yng2u.png)
