RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 15, 2014 at 4:24 pm
(October 15, 2014 at 3:56 pm)CristW Wrote: 1. If you want to be Bi-sexual that's your business not mine. As for the argument, that is still a "decision".
I didn't want to be bisexual. I just am, like you (supposedly) are heterosexual. You keep conflating sexual orientation with sexual intercourse. Sexual orientation only requires sexual attraction. You don't have to act on it. By your logic, you must have sex with every woman you will ever meet that you find attractive, or you're not really heterosexual, since you didn't act on it.
(October 15, 2014 at 3:56 pm)CristW Wrote: 2. I am not bi-sexual!
Good for you. Well, not really, but whatever.
(October 15, 2014 at 3:56 pm)CristW Wrote: I don't care if you are bi-sexual.
Good for you. For real this time.
(October 15, 2014 at 3:56 pm)CristW Wrote: However, when marriage comes up who do you marry?
It won't come up. Marriage is a worthless agreement. If my partner doesn't trust that I'll love them forever on the basis of my word, marriage won't make them change their minds.
However, in the hypothetical scenario in which I do choose to get married, my guess is that I'll marry my partner, like everyone else does. I'm not sure why this question even needed to be asked, TBH.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?