RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 14, 2014 at 12:51 pm
(October 14, 2014 at 12:43 pm)CristW Wrote:(October 14, 2014 at 12:39 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: I am doubting that someone could be born heterosexual. When the argument is cleared it all comes down to the act. Both sides could argue if a person is born straight or not. However, it really comes down to the act to be considered to be straight or not.
See how dumb that sounds when you consider the reasoning applied to your own (i assume) sexuality?
What are you saying? are you saying that if someone is heterosexual that they are "homosexual" just because you say so ???
No, that would be daft. Are you applying your fixation on "the act" to both homosexuality and heterosexuality, or ust homosexuality in specific? Because if you don't believe someone can be born homosexual, do you believe they can be born heterosexual?
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson
- Thomas Jefferson