(June 24, 2023 at 4:32 pm)Authari Wrote:(June 24, 2023 at 4:14 pm)Helios Wrote: Nope, you're the only one here who has suffered utter defeat I'm afraid. My banner flies high over the burning ruins of your non points. And you in those ruins you sit so broken by the utter humiliation you have suffered that you have become delirious and are imagining things that have not occurred as to not have to face the shame of your complete annihilation by my hands. Absolutely fabulous this TOTAL VICTORY of mine !!!
I dedicate MY unchallenged and absolute victory over you to the glorious nation of Canada
By contrast here is your flag of surrender
A flag that truly suits you
You made the assertion that infants do not have the RIGHT to live within the womb, ergo sir, I want you to explain why the woman has more of a 'right' to end her child's life because of her own poor life decision. Prove to me that the infant does NOT HAVE THE RIGHT. And if you say its her body its not, the infant as I have proved has its own cognizance.
![[Image: 20-19-38-788_512.gif]](https://cdn.pixabay.com/animation/2022/08/07/20/19/20-19-38-788_512.gif)
![[Image: 1000_F_153480607_mJVdbcAT2GUZB6ldLzuvUQ8xEF95JPJv.jpg]](https://as1.ftcdn.net/v2/jpg/01/53/48/06/1000_F_153480607_mJVdbcAT2GUZB6ldLzuvUQ8xEF95JPJv.jpg)
First of all, it is not an infant. It is a fetus. An infant is a baby that has been delivered.
Nice try at poisoning the well, you clown.
The woman has a right to end her pregnancy, because she does not have to allow another life to use her body for life support if she chooses not to.
Please name one other circumstance where someone is forced to sustain the life of another life against their will.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
