Why does science always upstage God?

[Billy Bob]

Oh, it was not valid. And the reason is...

Our current laws of physics are incapable of accurately describing the universe before the inception of the big bang and so our laws are not knowably applicable at the time when the universe ostensibly began.

But keep spinning your outrageous fantasy for anyone bored enough to listen.

Honestly, you have the attention span of a two-year-old.  Try to keep up, shitpants.

Crap, you skipped that part showing why they are no longer valid. Gee, I thought they were still the 1st and 2nd laws.

It only seemed that way because you forgot to take your pills and had a seizure, wiping your memory of the time during which you read my explaining it to you.

And now, rant away.  I'm done with you as you have the brains of a bowl of lukewarm guacamole, and only know one trick, vapidly repeating, "Did not! Did not!"

Soooooooooooooooo   fucking lame.

"Our current laws of physics are incapable of accurately describing the universe before the inception of the big bang and so our laws are not knowably applicable at the time when the universe ostensibly began."

That's why I put....

Evidence points to nothing does nothing. Real science says if there was something there already it must fit with the evidence of what we know. It must be observable, repeatable, and falsifiable. We know the 1LT says there's a conservation of energy. It can change forms and neither can be created or destroyed. Creation cannot happen by natural means. The 2LT has various aspects, one being the universe is winding down, entropy. Usable energy is becoming less usable, so at one point usable energy was at its max. This (the 1LT and 2LT) all points to a supernatural creation, by a supernatural creator at a certain point in which matter, space and time were created. When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the doubters resort to science-fiction. Once a supernatural creation is accepted, then the next step is finding proof of what supernatural power did it. We know these laws and have NO doubts about them.

Read it again...When I read how it can happen otherwise, ALL the doubters resort to science-fiction.

You chose the natural way when you have NO science to back it up. All you can do is cry about it since you have nothing else. 


[quote pid='2110470' dateline='1658711258']
Crap, you skipped that part showing why they are no longer valid. Gee, I thought they were still the 1st and 2nd laws.
[/quote]


"It only seemed that way because you forgot to take your pills and had a seizure, wiping your memory of the time during which you read my explaining it to you."

What in the world is "It only seemed that way because you forgot to take your pills and had a seizure, wiping your memory of the time during which you read my explaining it to you."

They ARE laws. Laws that pertain to the natural realm. You have no proof of an eternal universe nor how creation can happen naturally by getting around those NATURAL laws. Oh, but you brats don't like that so you just want to throw out the laws. There was nothing. Nothing means no thing. No space, matter, and time. From there we clearly got something that could not have happened naturally. That's science. All your pathetic 'we don't know' is not science, it's ignoring science.