RE: A few points of conflict with Jackie L's (Eilonnwy) article.
December 4, 2010 at 12:13 am
(This post was last modified: December 4, 2010 at 12:13 am by tavarish.)
I'll revive this thread for the sake of two comments I read on her page which had me rolling:
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-bosto...t-the-door
http://www.examiner.com/atheism-in-bosto...t-the-door
fallacy abounds']Really misguided and insulting. As a young, black American male, I find your writing to be clear evidence of your own lack of understanding of this complex issue. Furthermore, your responses to commenters have been fairly rude, so I'm not going to get sucked into this. I'd just like to say one thing: you're trivializing the struggles I've had socially by equating/linking them to my spiritual/intellectual struggles. You're wrong, and the way you speak of race smacks of racism. For every time you've told someone on this forum you don't get it", I'd like to give you one back:
"WHITE GIRL YOU DON'T KNOW SHIT ABOUT ME"
[/quote Wrote:and another:
[quote="ANON"]
Feminist diatribes, this one being no exception, are so often blatantly self-loathing and hypocritical. You call out others on their discriminatory practices through blanket statements, stereotypes, vacuous emotional pleas and ad hominem attacks. You make a futile attempt to portray yourself as taking the moral high ground, while never delving beyond a cursory look at your own privilege, or how this privilege affords you the opportunity to write what you do. The term "privilege" is a tool of the left, used almost exclusively to berate white men--the same color men who crafted the Western Civilization you cherish--and the same who now tolerate your drivel. Circumstantial advantages are contextual, and only an idiot would "check" such advantages. You are angry because you perceive in yourself a lack of such advantage and wish to possess it for yourself. The ironic thing is that you devalue this privilege while directly benefiting from it.
My blog: The Usual Rhetoric