Religion's affect outside of religion

[Neo-Scholastic]

Where I draw the line (on agreement) is where you continue to claim, despite our best attempts to explain to you, why it's entirely possible to make value judgments despite being an "ontological naturalist"....I'm not sure why you persist in claiming that we cannot make "value judgments" unless we have a magical friend in the sky.

And when have I ever argued for a magical friend in the sky? I'd like to see you find any post where I said that God was in the sky. To make a value judgement, someone must be able to identify the essential nature of something in order to determine the degree to which that something conforms to an ideal. Naturalism denies that anything has an essential nature.